A traffic police officer routinely pulled over a vehicle that ran a traffic light. The driver got out of the car, verbally attacked him, drew a handgun out and shot him, then walked up to him and kicked him in the gut before he jumped back into his car to wait for the police. Upon arriving, the police drove the perp away more concerned for his safety and comfort than for the wounded police officer. The shooter was connected to the Moroccan royal family. A shrif. A master. And we thought slavery was abolished.
Agent Mouhib, congratulations! You are now a prime candidate for a “GRIMA,” possibly a hefty bonus, and a promotion. Do not be surprised if you are handed your Permanent Change of Station orders as soon as you’re back on your feet; you are no longer wanted where people know you. High ranking officials, your commanding officer, Charqi Idraiss included, pursuing to protocol doctrines in our country, are going to pamper you, and if that does not work, threaten you, to coerce you to keep your mouth shut. Didn’t you see how they posted guards by your hospital room to prevent anyone from talking to you; how fast they segued into explanations and proclaimed your assailant, Hassan Al Ya’koubi, the in-law of the king of Morocco and a successful businessman, suffering from a mental illness; “ma diroush fih ‘akalkoum, rah hbeel meskin (don’t mind him, the poor man is crazy),” they’re saying. didn’t you hear how fast they are trying to cover this up? It is disturbing in no small measure.
In a democratic country, Al Ya’koubi would have been pulled out of the car and handcuffed at the scene; he would be sitting in jail waiting to appear before a judge to be charged with assault and battery on, and attempted murder of a uniformed police officer during the course of official duties. But here in Morocco, the sentence had already been cast the moment he shot and kicked you like a piece of trash, then calmly, remorselessly sat in his car making phone calls and waiting for your colleagues. You would think an insane man would turn his weapon against the crowd.
In a democratic country, even cops are not authorized fragmentary rounds because their use is inhumane and causes devastating internal injury. They are however used by criminals.
In a democratic country, even if, in the goodness of your heart, you decided to forgive your attacker, the government, as a true representative of the people, out of concern for their safety, would not concede its right to unleash the full wrath of the law on a psychopathic criminal who represents a serious danger to people. But here in Morocco, the safety and comfort of your high ranking attacker supersedes that of the common people; he is above the law. From a distorted perspective, you could say that the government is his representative against you.
Does the uniform you so proudly wear make you a representative of the law? A protector of the people? Does it command respect? Not by all it seems. Is there a law that punishes those who disrespect a uniformed officer (let alone shooting and then kicking him)? Of course there is. Will it apply to Al Ya’koubi? Let’s use Erraji as a standard for this one.
Are we all equal before the law, or are some more equal than others?
But I was told that the king does not stand for such overbearing, criminal attitudes as that displayed by Al Ya’koubi, nor does he stand for the actions of the officials who, by their toadyism, deride his efforts to drive Morocco into the 21st century.
This is an epochal moment. Let us hope.
Ahmed T. B. Copyright © 2008
Was this in CasaWOOD? (siba!) Wait! This rhythms very well with Hollywood…
Excuse my ignorance but i did not know in Morocco people are allowed to cary handguns… Ohhh i see, he is a shErif…
Hope Tarik is doing good…
Comment by Inspiration — September 12, 2008 @ 3:06 pm |
Are there any newspaper accounts of this story?
Comment by Jane — September 12, 2008 @ 3:19 pm |
Jane: Moroccan national newspapers reported on this.
Nadia: Licence to carry a weapon is very exclusive in Morocco. I understand that been close to the royal family, Al Ya’koubi was authorized to carry a weapon for self-defense. Shooting a uniformed police officer for a traffic ticket because he knew he would get away with it is plain wrong. And you know what I mean by “shrif” – not “sheriff” … “sherfa” those people who think they’re special …
Comment by cabalamuse — September 12, 2008 @ 9:15 pm |
Jane,
Look up almassae.press.ma They have it there today.
Comment by adilski — September 12, 2008 @ 9:59 pm |
Cabala
i was being sarcastic a bit when i wrote “shErif”… I intentionally put “e” in capital letters, and omitted an “f” at the end to give the shooter both honors, “shrif” and “sheriff”
Comment by inspiration — September 13, 2008 @ 12:45 am |
[...] Moroccan About the World Around Him analyzes the situation and is left with this conclusion: In a democratic country, Al Ya’koubi would have been pulled out [...]
Pingback by Global Voices Online » Morocco: Police Officer Shot by Member of Royal Family — September 13, 2008 @ 12:07 pm |
I am sorry just a little correction, in a democratic country, like you said, and I am talking about the US here, this guy will not be handcuffed, he would be shot dead…police officers have to assure their safety – I am sure you saw that in movies…but I agree with you….except that by now our Shriff is dead and it will sound like
“…I shot the SHerriiiifff….”
Comment by Boom basse — September 14, 2008 @ 4:02 am |
Boomer: If the shooter was not so well connected, he would have been shot to death by Moroccan police without hesitation. In the US, the use of deadly force is a last resort. The police have set procedures to follow in such cases (I think I saw this in “Police Academy one” or “two”). Sometimes, mistakes do happen even in the US. The case of Sean Bell, gunned down by police outside a club in Queens, NY, is a good illustration. He was unarmed, but failed the officers’ warning to stop. The judge rulled for the police officers.
Comment by cabalamuse — September 14, 2008 @ 2:14 pm |